Morning myth



The most effective conspiracies are the ones whose very existence we never suspect. Like the dastardly global breakfast plot.
See, it was complete news to you. There you were, munching contentedly on your morning toast and marmalade, blissfully unaware of the ugly truth. That meal you are now eating is a complete waste of time and money, a bad habit forced upon humanity by centuries of evil propaganda disseminated by the food industry.
It’s drummed into us from the day we are born – “breakfast is the most important meal of the day”.
What a load of rubbish. I have not eaten a single breakfast since the turn of the century at least, and I am still alive. Albeit in the dreary, empty and angst-filled  way that so many of us are nowadays, but still. I am proof that skipping breakfast does not inevitably lead to incessant yawning and terminal mid-morning coma. I obtain all my essential morning nutrients from a cup of coffee. OK, more often two or three cups.
The breakfast-Nazis have convinced the world that the meal is an institution like the family or the church, as essential to life as breathing or sleeping or checking your e-mails.
Google “breakfast” and you get an endless list of bed & breakfast establishments from Shanghai to Shoshanguve. It’s as if the two concepts are inseparable. Book into one of these places and say you just want the bed, no breakfast thanks, and an awkward silence descends. The owner freezes, aghast. As soon as you are out the room she will call the police and report you as a likely suicide-bomber.
The media perpetuate the myth with their “breakfast” shows, as if anyone who watches TV or listens to the radio in the morning without polishing off a plate of bacon and eggs at the same time must be from another planet.
How did this happen? It’s corporate greed, of course. Walk down the cereal aisle in any supermarket and the evidence is clear: miles and miles of Cornflakes and WeetBix and Sugar Pops and All Bran boxes stretching from floor to ceiling.  A great deal of money is riding on the fact that we all believe our survival depends on eating breakfast.
How can it possibly be healthy or even slightly pleasant to gobble down great gobs of carbohydrates and complex proteins as soon as you wake up, while your digestive system is still in repose?  
Until now, no one has had the courage to stand up and say “enough”. It’s likely that there are other closet anti-breakfast believers out there; but they are probably  terrified of revealing themselves lest they receive the dreaded 8am knock on the door from men in white chef’s coats who will force-feed them stodgy porridge, indigestible muesli, rubbery eggs, fatty sausages, tiers of soggy toast, and greasy chips slathered with congealed ketchup.
The very name “breakfast” is a triumph of misleading PR. We see it and think, “Oh, we have to eat this because we’ve been fasting.” For goodness sake. Going 12 hours without food since dinner the night before is not a fast. A fast is when you spend 40 days and nights in the wilderness without letting even a drop of water cross your lips until you hallucinate wildly and have conversations with an imaginary being in the sky.
The food multinationals have generously pumped their dollars into the medical fraternity, so we now have nutritionists solemnly opining that a failure to eat breakfast will almost certainly lead to obesity, among other dire consequences. The reasoning goes that if you don’t eat breakfast, then by 10am you’ll be starving and will gorge on sweets from the vending machine. It’s like saying you should smoke a cigarette first thing in the morning, otherwise you’ll be shooting up heroin before lunch.
Lunch. Now there’s another totally unnecessary meal. But let’s leave that for another day.




Comments